Reading Alone Together, the thing interests me
most is the definition of being alive. There’s a vivid story in the article that
after a 12-year-old tamagotchi ‘past way’, its owner wrote a poem in memory of
it. It might sound funny when thinking people mourn for a black and white pixel
game in the shape of an egg, but if you regard it as a companion for quite a
long time who would ask for your care and concerns day and night, you might
find it reasonable.
As is mentioned in
the article, the characteristics exclusively possessed by human being have
disappeared. After 1990s, artificial intelligences are thought to have both
feelings and needs, which were once considered unique to human beings comparing
to animals and computers. It blurs the boundary between being alive or not. In
the film A.I. by Steven Spielberg, a
robot boy David is designed to be nurtured by families who lose their children
or desperately want one. Monika’s son Martin is seriously sick in hospital and
in great grief, Monika takes David home for accompanies. He completely rely on
Monika because he is ordered to love her for his whole life. He cries when mom
doesn’t love him, stand out to protect her when he senses danger, and he feels
jealous when Martin comes back home and win back mom’s heart. He’s such a real
boy, but also he’s consisted of rubber skins, electronic components and steel
bones. The question is shall we consider him alive?
The thing may even
gets more sophisticated when taking in the imagination of ‘singularity point’.
As is described by the author, singularity point is when artificial
intelligence gets the critical moment between they are limited-functioned and
they are omnipotent. There’s a guess that after we get that point, we may merge
with the robotic and achieve immortality, which again raises the unsolved issue
concerning the definition is being alive. To think boldly, there’s going to be
a various forms of the human-robot merging, like a disabled human with steel
leg, or a physically dead person with wires connected to his brain, which keep
him conscious. The latter one might seems reluctant to be considered alive, since
we are not used to keep relationships with a brain soaking in nutrient
solution, but how can I say he’s not alive, I mean, there isn’t any crucial
difference between him and the guy with an artificial limb, is there?
Therefore, what
singularity point may bring about, as for me, is a series of philosophical
problems and following moral issues, like the legislation of the protection of
A.I., or the social status of human being and A.I. or new rules of the distribution
of recourses. Apart from being ‘technological rapture’, as is described by the
author, it may also be an ethical disaster.
没有评论:
发表评论